Pages

13 May, 2012

Sourav Ganguly

Have a great day.


Why only I am the target of the critics? Wonders former Team India captain Sourav Ganguly during one of the IPL matches.
…..If only Ganguly knows that some –ex-cricketers want to make a living out of criticizing popular cricketers, particularly the types of the left-hander, because of their on-field aggressive nature and approach.
Known for his-bare-chested celebration at the Lord’s Test, Ganguly should ignore his critics and focus on his work instead, because distractions may increase inconsistency in his batting.
For example in his attempt to bell the cat, former cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar went hammer and tongs against Sachin Tendulkar’s “poor performance” a few years ago.
TV channels too joined Manjrekar’s attack and they coined a word—Endulkar--- just because it sounded lyrical (to them).
The charlatans thought Tendulkar had become a spent force after playing fifteen years then, which is seen as the maximum life span of a cricketer in the game. They also thought that attacking the little master would help them eke out a living.
But Tendulkar did not buckle under the pressure of their criticism, instead the master made Manjrekar and others to eat crow.
And it was possible because Tendulkar maintained his cool and gave a damn to his critics as he came back with a vengeance becoming one of the key members in the World Cup winning team headed by M S Dhoni.
He went on to complete 100 international hundreds, making the critics hurry to scurry for cover as he forced his critics to rewrite Endulkar as Tondulkar.
Tendulkar did not leave his critics there. Recently he said it was not his critics, but he was the master of his destiny and had the right to decide on his retirement.
Ganguly should take a leaf out of Tendulkar’s abhorrence against mean critics, who only want to make a living out of criticizing others, and give a damn to their criticism.
Another factor is that critics write bitterly because there are fans who love to read articles written against those cricketers whom rival fans at the paras (localities) adore.
For example a Dhoni’s fan loves to read negative reports against other cricketers, whom his/her friend idolizes------this will give the rival fans material for conversation and engage in arguments based on articles and what the pretenders say on idiot box, posing as commentators.
 Also by engaging themselves in the media, the critics, mostly former cricketers, get a chance to be in the game long after their retirement.
Dada should also introspect whether he had criticised or judged on performance of any other cricketer during his stint in the commentary box and written critical comments in his columns?
 ---------------